b4bdd17e4e
`ksu handles devpts with selinux lsm hook` - aviraxp - no, not yet, but yes we can, thats a good idea. This change tries to do that, so instead of hooking pts_unix98_lookup or devpts_get_priv, we just watch security_inode_permission, if its devpts, pass it along to the original handler. EDIT: define devpts super magic if its undefined - yeah I aint gonna include a conditional include of a header just for this - while we can just fully remove the macro and inline, readability loss is bad Co-authored-by: backslashxx <118538522+backslashxx@users.noreply.github.com>