`ksu handles devpts with selinux lsm hook` - aviraxp
- no, not yet, but yes we can, thats a good idea.
This change tries to do that, so instead of hooking pts_unix98_lookup or
devpts_get_priv, we just watch security_inode_permission, if its devpts,
pass it along to the original handler.
EDIT: define devpts super magic if its undefined
- yeah I aint gonna include a conditional include of a header just for this
- while we can just fully remove the macro and inline, readability loss is bad
Co-authored-by: backslashxx <118538522+backslashxx@users.noreply.github.com>
ccc5cb74bf